Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Jul 25, 2025
Abstract
Teaching EFL through children’s literature to young learners is becoming an important teaching strategy in many parts of the world. When carefully selected and used with a clear pedagogical purpose, children’s literature—especially picturebooks—can help improve young learners’ reading comprehension and support the development of their language skills. However, for this to happen, it is necessary that EFL preservice teachers receive proper training on how to work with children’s literature and how to prepare pedagogical materials based on these texts. This article focuses on exploring the post-reading activities designed by a group of EFL preservice teachers at a statal university in Santiago, Chile. The aim is to analyze what types of reading approaches were encouraged in the post-reading activities and what kind of activity designs were developed. The findings show a variety of strategies, with the reader-response approach being the most common. This was followed by the text-based approach, which focused on comprehension and analysis, and the language approach, which aimed to support vocabulary and grammar development. While the preservice teachers were able to design activities that combine language and literary goals, the study also suggests the need to deepen their understanding of multimodal and critical engagements with literature.
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Policies for open access journals
Authors who publish here accept the following terms: Authors will keep their copyright and will guarantee the journal the right to the first publication of their work, which will be subject to the Licence of Creative Commons acknowledgement, which allows for the use of this material only if the authorship is credited and the original source is acknowledged (the journal’s URL), and if it is not used with commercial ends and with any derivations of the original work.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements of distribution of the published version (e.g. to save it onto a digital institutional archive or publish it in a monographic volume) only if the initial publication of this journal is indicated.
It is permitted and recommended for authors to divulge their work on the Internet (e.g. institutional digital archives or webpage) before and during the submission process, which may lead to interesting exchanges and increase the citations of the publication. (See Open Access Effect).
References
Arboleda, A., & Castro Garcés, A. (2019). Fostering language learning in the university EFL classroom through literature: A task-based approach. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 19, 101- 127. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.706
Barahona, M. (2016). Challenges and accomplishments of ELT at primary level in Chile: Towards the aspiration of becoming a bilingual country. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24. http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2448
Bland, J. (2015). Pictures, images and deep reading. CLELE Journal, 3(2), 24-36.
Bloemert, J., Jansen, E., & van de Grift, W. (2016). Exploring EFL literature approaches in Dutch secondary education, Language, Culture and Curriculum, 29(2), 169-188, DOI: 10.1080/07908318.2015.1136324.
Calafato, R., & Simmonds, K. (2022). Linkages between literary response, aesthetic competence, and literary competence in the EFL classroom. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 75, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101214
Carter, R., & Long, M. N. (1991). Teaching Literature. Harlow: Longman.
Cohen, L. Manion, L., & K. Morrison. (2018). Research methods in education. Routledge.
Febriani, R. B., Rukmini, D., Mujiyanto, J., & Yuliasri, I. (2022). Lecturers’ perception on the implementation of approaches to teaching literature in EFL classrooms. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(1), 349-364.
Garzón, E., & Castañeda-Peña, H. (2015). Applying the reader-response theory to literary texts in EFL pre-service teachers’ initial education. English Language T eaching, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n8p187
Hall, G. (2015). Recent Developments in Uses of Literature in Language Teaching BT . In M. Teranishi, Y.
Saito, & K. Wales (Eds.), Literature and Language Learning in the EFL Classroom (pp. 13–25). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137443663_2
Jia-Fen, W. (2017). Teaching university students cultural diversity by means of multi-cultural picture books in Taiwan. Multicultural Education Review, 9(4), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/2005615X.2017.1383812.
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage.
Lindstrom, C., & Goade, M. (2020). We are water protectors. Roaring Brook Press.
Masoni, L. (2018). The role of authentic children’s literature in primary EFL teacher training. Innovative language learning international conference.
Mourão, S. (2016). Picturebooks in the primary EFL classroom: Authentic aiterature for an Authentic response. CLELE journal, 4(1), 25-43.
Munsch, R. (1998). The paper bag princess. Annick Press.
Nguyen, H. T. T. (2016). How does an interactive approach to literary texts work in an English as a foreign language context? Learners’ perspectives in close-up. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 171- 189. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2014.932361
Nikolajeva, M., & Scott, C. (2001). How picture books work. Routledge.
Pantaleo, S. (2015). Filling in the gaps: Exploring the writerly metaphors in Shaun Tan`s The Red Tree. In J. Evans (Ed.), Challenging and Controversial Picturebooks. Routledge.
Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Sage.
Romero Karlsson, G., & Barahona, M. (2024). Exploring literary competences in EFL preservice teachers’ pedagogical proposals, Cogent Education, 11:1, 2406140, DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2406140
Romero Karlsson, G. (2016). The role of English literature in English pedagogy programs in Santiago de Chile. Lenguas Modernas, 48, 83-103.
Sendak, M. (1963). Where the wild things are. Harper & Row.
Serafini, F. (2015). Paths to interpretation: Developing students’ interpretive repertoires. Language and Literacy, 17(3), 118-133.
Stead, P. (2010). A sick day for Amos McGee. Roaring Brook Press.
Stortz, R., Martinez, M., Harmon, J., Cataldo, R., & Marie Juarez, L. (2019). Helping preservice teachers realize the transformative potential of read alouds. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 40(3), 238–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2018.1561560
Sun, X. (2023). Literature in secondary EFL class: Case studies of four experienced teachers’ reading programmes in China. The Language Learning Journal, 51(2), 145-160. DOI: 10.1080/09571736.2021.1958905
Sun, X. (2022). Teaching young adult literature in secondary L2 classrooms: a case study of The Outsiders reading programme. The Language Learning Journal. DOI: 10.1080/09571736.2022.2107694
Tutaş, N. (2006). Theory into practice: Teaching and responding to literature aesthetically. In Paran, (ed.), 133–145.
Valencia Leguizamón, M., & Neus Real, M. N. (2019). Libro álbum y formación básica docente. Un estudio de caso en la Universidad del Quindío. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 12(3) 65-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.847.
Van, T. (2009). The relevance of literary analysis to teaching literature in the EFL classroom. English Teaching Forum, 3, 2-9.
Wang, S., & Lei, B. (2018). The present situation and creative significance of the development of Chinese picture book teaching. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 238, 704-707. https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/sser-18.2018.148.
Wissman, K. K. (2019). Reading radiantly: Embracing the power of picturebooks to cultivate the social imagination. Bookbird: A Journal of International Children's Literature, 57(1), 14-25.
Youngs, S., & Kyser, C. (2020). Bringing form, content and aesthetics together: Preservice teachers reading contemporary picturebooks and designing multimodal responses. Literacy Research and Instruction, 60(3), 264–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2020.1822472
